I wanted to post an update that McQuown has hung up his shoes and his nefarious walk for “homeless veterans” is over. GOOD! Had he been transparent as he vowed he would and proven that the donations received actually benefited homeless veterans this would have had a different ending.
This is also a reminder to people that when you feel compelled to donate to a charity or organization you should research it first to determine if it is legitimate or not.
Several months ago I was approached by a group of veterans who investigate and expose stolen valor. If you aren’t aware of what stolen valor is – to define it simply is – it is an individual who embellishes his military career or military accomplishments. For the past few years, this group has been trying to put a stop to a walk across America being done under the guise of assisting homeless veterans. Well, actually the mission of the walk has apparently changed over the course of the last 3 years to accommodate and stave off the “haters”. Haters is what McQuown and his “event coordinators” label anyone who speaks out against his alleged fraudulent activity. Generally the “haters” ends up being those kind folks who donated money to Mr. McQuown and later found out that they were duped and that not one dime of any donation received by him has been appropriated to any veterans issues; nor has one dime been financially accounted for when donors have demanded proof of where the funds have gone or were spent.
This post is going to be lengthy so please bear with me but it is important to see all of the evidence and how the puzzle fits together with all of the evidence that is out there. Mr. McQuown is a con-artist and his job is to defraud good people out of their money.
McQuown is a discharged US Marine. He has claimed to have been given a bad conduct discharge and an other than honorable discharge for being absent without leave for over 200 days. Most Marines will tell you that this length of time is considered desertion, but McQuown was never charged with desertion. General consensus is that he was such a shit bird that the Marine Corps just got rid of him on an other than honorable discharge — which is still REALLY bad. McQuown makes a big deal about how or why he wasn’t charged with desertion and that because he wasn’t charged he’s not a “deserter” Tomato, tomato. It’s semantics at this point, and even though he claims that he took his ID card with him and had planned on going back the bottom line is that he left his post unauthorized for over 200 days. He bailed on his duties as a Marine and never looked back until he was forced to deal with it.
Continue reading Leonard Mac McQuown: A Walking Dishonorable Sham
I was able to find a copy of the Bill of Particulars online – thanks to who posted the copy on Twitter. I know I sound like a broken record when I say that this case continues to get stranger and stranger with each court hearing, but it’s true. This case is like a rotten onion. The more you peel back layers the more funk that lies underneath. This past court hearing didn’t disappoint in the deliverance of the “funk”. Superintendent McVey’s attorney had asked that the State provide a Bill of Particulars regarding allegations against their client. I have included the 4 pages that were posted, and transcribed from page 4 which reads as follows:
- Nature of Offense: Obstructing Official Business, specifically the defendant violated Section 2921.31(A)M-2, Ohio Revised Code.
- Conduct of Defendant, Date and Time: Michael McVey, defendant, from on or about April 5, 2012 to November 19, 2013, within the County of Jefferson aforesaid, in violation of section 2921.31(A) of the Ohio Revised Code, did without privilege to do so and with purpose to prevent, obstruct, or delay the performance by a public official of any authorized act within the public official’s official capacity, did commit an act that hampered or impeded a public official in the performance of the public official’s lawful duties, to wit: including but not limited to the following: deleted emails, “wiped” computer(s) (and/or had someone else “wipe” computer(s)), failed to comply with subpoenas served upon him, failed to provide information regarding an investigation the school undertook and/or lied about an investigation that the school undertook, manufactured email(s) with false or misleading information, directed others to create record(s) after the fact, and/or created a misleading timeline after the first subpoena was served upon him.
Continue reading Steubenville: Time to Take Out the Trash
After all of the publicity surrounding the Steubenville case, it is hard to comprehend that ANYONE in their right mind would attempt to protect their own when it comes to sexual abuse allegations within a school system. That is exactly what is happening in Delbarton, WV by school administration at Burch Middle School.
On Thursday West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey filed an injunction against several employees at Burch Middle School and the Mingo County Board of Education seeking injunctive relief based on allegations of sexual abuse by two juvenile boys who are alleged to be related to school administrators, as well as civil rights violations against the victims. The complaint seeks to prevent the school administration and teachers from preventing or interfering with the criminal investigation and Human Rights Commission investigation into the sexual assault allegations.
On Friday a statement was issued by school administrators which read:
“We are aware of the complaint that has been filed in the Circuit Court of Mingo County. Once the county has been formally served, we will respond accordingly. Mingo County Schools takes student safety seriously and remains committed to providing a secure environmental for all students.”
Continue reading Burch Middle School: Mandatory Reporting Failure
It happened…I think all of us who had been involved in the Steubenville case knew that eventually Hollywood would pick up on this story even if it became a Lifetime movie. There were just so many events that happened in this case for someone not to bring it to the big screen – from me and my anonymous commenters being sued for defamation of character in an attempt to silence us to KYAnonymous being raided for not “hacking” a football fan site to six school employees and/or coaches being indicted by a special grand jury for obstruction of justice, and other charges. Bottom line is this case has pissed off a lot of people: the good, the bad, the ugly, but it has also forced an open discussion about rape culture and bystander intervention. Had ONE person stood up that night and done the right thing — none of us would even be having this discussion.
There is an opportunity here for this film to reach millions of adults and teens alike to frankly and candidly discuss rape culture and encouraging them to be THAT person who stands up to do the right thing. Like the concept of the movie or not, Deric, Michelle and thousands of others did something magnificently profound and beautiful: They stood up and did something honorable. They made the people of the world stop for a moment and acknowledge rape culture and victim blaming. Rape culture DOES exist and people are now candidly talking about it. Universities, schools and people gathered around water coolers at work are discussing rape culture. Parents are openly talking to their children about it.
I hope Brad Pitt and Plan B Entertainment expound on this and keep this discussion moving forward in a positive and effective manner.
The following is part three of a series involving a 2014 New Mexico double murder trial. I look forward to your responses to this case and discussing the court system process in America. –
Find me on Twitter @EllamentryMDW
Reasonable Doubt Part 3
Ronald Santiago spent two and one half days in the psychiatric ward at Kaseman Hospital while Secret Service (SS) agent Brian Nguyen began to dig into the self-proclaiming criminal’s past. Santiago had volunteered he committed a crime, was very anxious and gave more information than asked for at their first meeting. This combination gave the agent cause to look deeper. At first glance, Santiago seemed like your standard straight up guy. He told Nguyen he had no prior trouble with the law, held down two jobs – a paid his taxes type fellow. Those jobs peaked Nguyen’s curiosity.
Santiago worked at Countrywide, the same office that had dealings with Greg and Bernadette Ohlemacher the summer of their deaths. He also worked as an armed security guard in the northeast foothills of the city. Although individually, these jobs would appear innocuous, nearly every law enforcement agency was aware of the double homicide ten months earlier. Nguyen put the pieces together, including the discovery that Santiago qualified for his NM state firearms license required to work that second job with a Ruger 9mm. It was time to have a different type of conversation with Santiago.
Continue reading Reasonable Doubt Part 3
The following is part two of a series involving a 2014 New Mexico double murder trial. I look forward to your responses to this case and discussing the court system process in America. –
Find me on Twitter @EllamentryMDW
The police descended upon Dover Court, Albuquerque, New Mexico on a Tuesday morning August 2005. No one was allowed to leave the cul de sac, nor was anyone allowed near the area, including the Vigil family. Bernadette Ohlemacher was one of eight Vigil siblings and the youngest child of Dora Vigil. Racing to Albuquerque from Santa Fe, they assembled by the crime tape, unable to get word to Renee or any information from APD.
Later that morning, Renee was photographed then transported from the mobile crime van (more like an RV) to police headquarters where she handed over her pajamas and robe in exchange for a white paper “bunny suit.” This is the building Renee would be interrogated that day and several other times during the investigation. She admitted years later she hated that building. She was none too fond of APD either.
Continue reading Reasonable Doubt: Part II
The following is part one of a series involving a 2014 New Mexico double murder trial. I look forward to your responses to this case and discussing the court system process in America. – Ella Mentry Find me on Twitter @EllamentryMDW
We have seen it on the weekly network crime shows. The defense attorney never reveals whether or not his or her client is guilty of murder. It makes no difference. The job is all about reasonable doubt and convincing 12 men and women of its existence.
We begin with some background. Just before dawn on August 2, 2005 a 911 came into the dispatch center of the Albuquerque Police Department (APD). Renee Ohlemacher, 20, was on the other end of the line claiming to be hiding in her bedroom closet because she had heard shouting, screams and gunshots coming from her parents’ room across the hall, followed by heavy hurried footsteps pounding down the stairs.
Continue reading Reasonable Doubt