Your Child’s Social Media Profile

Visitors Online

The Sociopath’s Checklist or Something to Think About

Random musings, observations and insights regarding the Jody Arias case.

By Paula Uruburu, author of American Eve.

Forgive me but I couldn’t resist. I borrowed my title from what was apparently a blog belonging to none other than Jody Arias, circa May 2008, written only a few months before she savagely murdered Travis Alexander, the man she continues to claim she loves? Or loved? I’m not sure which is correct, since her story shifts as often as her tenses — and her eyes while being cross-examined about what happened that terrible day five years ago. Even after finally admitting to having stabbed Alexander 29 times, to having slit his throat from ear to ear, to having shot him in the head, the persona that the former provocatively-dressed-bottle-blonde has adopted — a reinvented, buttoned-up, colorless mousy faux-Mormon martyr in ugly glasses, now claims that virtually all of her actions before, during, and after the butchery of Alexander, were done with his best interests at heart. Really? Does that include depicting him as being an abuser and a pedophile? And now, torturing his family with a story the dead man cannot defend himself against?

It took her several years to get to this point – I have lost count of the number of lies she has told, beginning with “I wasn’t
there” to the ludicrous story of two ninjas (has anyone actually ever seen a ninja outside the movies?)– and because I am not
familiar with the specific tenets of Mormonism, I confess that I am speaking from a more catholic point of view. But let me just
say that if the sin of omission counts, she is well on her way to hell.

The order of actions by which she attacked Travis Alexander in gruesome degrees was the subject of a significant portion of her infuriating yet oddly fascinating testimony on the stand over the last two and a half weeks. One of many questions I have is how a bullet casing could have fallen on top of a dried puddle of blood if she shot him before the stabbing and slicing. But I digress.

I am not a psychiatrist or a lawyer, but I am a student of human nature and criminal behavior, and I know a sociopath when I see one. Put aside for the moment her chameleon-like ability to alter her memory (like her looks) to suit her needs, her constant manipulation of language (she misuses words like edify when she thinks she’s being smart), her lack of empathy and flat affect, her narcissism and pattern of stalking behavior prior to the murder, or her deliberate attempts to cover her tracks after the fact (sending texts to the man she left in his shower to rot). Is there anything more infuriating and insensitive than sending flowers to Travis Alexander’s grandmother? To referring on the stand to his “passing away” when in reality she was the one who butchered him (after making sure he was as vulnerable as possible — without raising his suspicions — virtually assuring that his movements would be constricted by being wet and naked and unsuspecting in a shower stall while she was fully-dressed and armed and on solid footing?)

Below is my sociopath’s checklist. See how many you think apply to Jody Arias:

  • Glibness under pressure
  • Superficial charm but covertly controlling and hostile to those who challenge that perception.
  • Dominates and humiliates her victim (in this case, after the fact, by exposing the “dirty secrets” of sexual behaviors she knows will be looked at as deviant by a large segment of society.)
  • A grandiose sense of self-importance
  • Pathological lying — easily; seems incapable basis. Creates (and can of lies tied to beliefs abilities.
  • Lack of remorse, shame or guilt
  • Secretive
  • Sees others only as targets or opportunities. The end always justifies her means.
  • An incapacity for genuine love/incapable of real human compassion
  • A need for Stimulation - living on the edge (in this case, again, through forbidden sexual behaviors, stalking, slashing tires, et al). Feels she is unbound by normal social contracts. Her behavior is often irrational and extremely risky.
  • Exaggerates qualities and invents stories, often to the point of absurdity — but when she describes actions or events, for some reason, she can sound believable (if you ignore the facts).
  • More spontaneous and intense than most other people — tends to do bizarre, sometimes erratic things that most people wouldn’t do.
  • Manipulative in all attempts to be convincing – seeks to dominate others and “win” at all costs. She defends her web
  • of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.
  • Sees self-serving behavior as absolutely permissible and justifiable.
  • Displays shallow emotions – when she shows what seems to be warmth or compassion, it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive.
  • Irritated by insignificant matters, yet remains unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person.
  • Callousness — unable to empathize with the pain of her victim or his family. Seems unable to feel remorse or guilt
  • Poor behavioral controls — falls into an addictive cycle with her victim; stalks and seduces him, playing on his
  • weaknesses.
  • Believes she is all-powerful, entitled to every wish, with no sense of personal boundaries and no concern for her impact on others.
  • Has problems in making and keeping friends (I have seen a lot of photos of Travis and friends in a variety of social situations; where is the photographic evidence of Jody’s friends and supporters?)
  • Not concerned about wrecking others’ lives and dreams and is oblivious or indifferent to the devastation she causes.
  • Does not accept blame, but instead blames others, even for acts she now admits she committed.
  • A parasitic lifestyle – lives off others to feed a vision of herself (even stealing Travis’s own story about having once
  • been held at gunpoint)
  • Attempted to exercise despotic control over every aspect of her victim’s life
  • Contemptuous of those who challenge her (calling prosecutor Martinez!)
  • Criminal versatility — changes her image as needed – first to avoid suspicion and now to avoid being found guilty.
  • Changes her life story readily and easily.
  • Does not perceive that anything is wrong with her

Am I missing any????

 

6 comments to The Sociopath’s Checklist or Something to Think About

  • I’m a bit sad knowing that so many good people have no idea what they’re dealing with when faced with sociopath, psychopath or narcissistic person. For this reason your post should be put in front as many eyes as possible. Thanks

    • prinnie

      I haven’t had time to really follow this case, but I really believe that Jodi is mentally ill. Just as I believe Aileen Wuornos was CLEARLY mentally ill and suffering a psychotic break before she was executed. I am on the fence about the death penalty, but feel strongly that anyone watching her final video could determine that she was clearly suffering from some sort of psychosis.

      • Prinnie, I have been following this case and I do believe Jodi is mentally ill. I listened to a video of her mother when she broke down sobbing that all she and her husband wanted was for her to move close to them so they could take care of her and help her. Killing Travis the way she did is so terrible. My Heart Aches for his family.

  • C

    This line stood out to me: “provocatively-dressed-bottle-blonde has adopted — a reinvented, buttoned-up, colorless mousy faux-Mormon martyr in ugly”…

    I don’t know the specifics of this case. But this comment reminded me of the “slut-shaming” that was done to the Steubenville rape survivor. The women in this case may indeed be guilty, but I’m sure there is more concrete evidence of her guilt than her just transforming her previously “provocative” (i.e., what you mean is slutty, right?) dress to something more ‘mousy’ and chaste.

    You did a great job covering the Steubenville rape case and the unjust and insulting misogyny and shaming that is directed to rape victims in regards to how they dress, behave, etc. I get that this is a totally different case and issue and that this woman herself has resorted to “shaming” her alleged victim by disclosing his “dirty” sexual secrets. But that doesn’t mean you should stoop to her level when describing her appearance. It’s that type of inadvertent, unintentional sexism that contributes to America’s overall gender problems. Even when it’s done in cases or situations where it seems justified, that type of commentary makes others think that it’s also acceptable to apply it to totally different, inapplicable cases too (such as rape cases). You may think I’m blowing this out of proportion, but little acts of inadvertent sexism really do contribute to our culture of misogyny.

    • Sock Monkey

      @ C: Please explain why you are chastising Prinnie for a guest post written by Paula Uruburu? Your comment is nit-picking, insulting & ridiculous. Pitching a fit at Prinnie for something she didn’t even write is beyond rude.

  • C

    @ Sock Monkey, you’re right. I didn’t realize Prinnie didn’t write this post. I’m sorry I directed this at her instead of at Paula. But I still think my criticism is valid and don’t think I was “pitching a fit.” I was very respectful and praised Prinnie for her reporting on the Steubenville case.